Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 92

A fund manager’s perspective on ASX’s mFund

In September 2014, the ASX launched its new Managed Fund Settlement Service (mFund) initiative. mFund enables investors to buy and sell units in unlisted managed funds through an ASX broker. The service replaces traditional paper-based processes and uses the same electronic system (CHESS) as for settling ASX share transactions. There are many expected benefits for investors, including diversification, efficiency, convenience, and speed.

Expectation of a ‘slow burn’

Ibbotson decided to participate from the start because developing multiple ways to access our products puts investors in control, opening a wide range of professionally-managed investments in a way that works best for them. We’re confident investors will embrace this way of investing in managed funds, enjoying the same paperless investment experience they have with share trading.

The ASX’s marketing strategy is focused towards its large and engaged following of self-directed investors who seek the control and efficiency that mFund has been designed to offer. We consider this channel to be distinct from investors who engage with a financial adviser.

Our expectations are realistic and it’s our belief that mFund will be a relatively slow burn. But what new investment initiative takes off overnight? Managed accounts have been available in Australia for well over a decade, and have only recently gained meaningful traction. It’s a similar story for Exchange Traded Funds.

Ibbotson received flows as soon as the initiative launched, so our initial experience has been positive. We’ve also supported the ASX’s marketing efforts by participating in a national road show with events for both advisers and investors. This was an opportunity to gather valuable information about the type of investors most interested in mFund. This insight will enable us to enhance our marketing and distribution plans to leverage the momentum of the launch.

Sorting out the technology issues

Becoming a foundation member was a learning curve for all involved. From a technology perspective, the key decision was whether to build an in-house CHESS interface based on CHESS open interface specifications, allowing us to act as a Product Issuer Settlement Participant (PISP), or whether to engage with an external service provider to act as our PISP. We chose the outsourcing route, leveraging the existing CHESS interface of our chosen service provider, MainstreamBPO. This reduced the technology burden significantly.

We settled on the sub-registrar model for integrating mFund into our existing operational processes. As part of its PISP role, MainstreamBPO maintains a sub-register of all investors accessing our products through mFund. MainstreamBPO aggregates transactions originating through mFund and pushes these through to our master registry. We adopted this model with little or no disruption to our existing unit pricing and investment administration processes.

We also had to make minor adjustments to the Product Disclosure Statements for the funds offered through the mFund service, as well as implement additional reporting capabilities to the ASX before going live. Future participants will benefit from the issues resolution foundation members have been through with the ASX and the various PISPs.

With brokers responsible for ‘know your client’ checks and our PISP, MainstreamBPO, responsible for processing applications, our role is to invest the application monies. This has not generated hard cost savings, but has produced efficiency gains.

Why are some brokers and fund managers not involved?

As more investors take control of their investments, particularly via SMSFs, they’ll look for easy and cost effective ways to access investment solutions which diversify their portfolios. mFund provides savings for investors, enabling them to avoid wraps and platform administration fees.

It’s stating the obvious that those fund managers with aligned platforms and wraps have not yet embraced mFund. They have an established distribution channel to their target audience, and so are in a position where they can wait, watch, and monitor flows. Similarly, a key determinant of mFund’s success will be the extent to which investors demand the mFund capability from their online brokers.

A bigger pull (or push) factor will be needed to attract these players, which will take time to play out.

 

Helena Hill is Product and Communications Manager at Ibbotson Associates.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Is Magellan's listed fund a game changer?

ASA’s view on the banning of LIC commissions

Five features of a fair performance fee, including a holiday

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Five months on from cancer diagnosis

Life has radically shifted with my brain cancer, and I don’t know if it will ever be the same again. After decades of writing and a dozen years with Firstlinks, I still want to contribute, but exactly how and when I do that is unclear.

Uncomfortable truths: The real cost of living in retirement

How useful are the retirement savings and spending targets put out by various groups such as ASFA? Not very, and it's reducing the ability of ordinary retirees to fully understand their retirement income options.

Is Australia ready for its population growth over the next decade?

Australia will have 3.7 million more people in a decade's time, though the growth won't be evenly distributed. Over 85s will see the fastest growth, while the number of younger people will barely rise. 

The public servants demanding $3m super tax exemption

The $3 million super tax will capture retired, and soon to retire, public servants and politicians who are members of defined benefit superannuation schemes. Lobbying efforts for exemptions to the tax are intensifying.

20 US stocks to buy and hold forever

Recently, I compiled a list of ASX stocks that you could buy and hold forever. Here’s a follow-up list of US stocks that you could own indefinitely, including well-known names like Microsoft, as well as lesser-known gems.

The ultimate superannuation EOFY checklist 2024

We're nearing the end of the financial year and it's time for SMSFs and other super funds to make the most of the strategies available to them. Here's a 24-point checklist of the most important issues to address.

Latest Updates

Shares

Are term deposits attractive right now?

If you’re like me, you may have put money into term deposits over the past year and it’s time to decide whether to roll them over or look elsewhere. Here are the pros and cons of cash versus other assets right now.

Retirement

How retiree spending plummets as we age

There's been little debate on how spending changes as people progress through retirement. Yet, it's a critical issue as it can have a significant impact on the level of savings required at the point of retirement.

Estate planning made simple, Part I

Every year, millions of dollars are spent on legal fees, and thousands of hours are wasted on family disputes - all because of poor estate planning. Here's a guide to a key part of estate planning - making an effective will.

Investment strategies

Markets are about to get a whole lot harder

As the world shifts away from one of artificially suppressed interest rates and cheap manufacturing, investors will need to carefully consider how companies are positioned to navigate the new higher-cost paradigm.

Investment strategies

Why commodities deserve a place in portfolios

2024 looks set to be another year of reflation and geopolitical uncertainty — with the latter significantly raising the tail risk of a return to problematic inflation. That’s a supportive backdrop for commodities.

Property

What’s next for Australian commercial real estate?

It's no secret that Australian commercial property has endured its most challenging period since the GFC. Yet, there are encouraging signs that the worst may be over and industry returns should improve in the medium term.

Shares

Board games: two hidden risks for stock pickers?

Allan Gray's Simon Mawhinney thinks two groups with huge influence over our public companies often fall short of helping shareholders. In this interview, Mawhinney also talks boards, takeovers, and active investing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.