Warning about investing in unit trusts in June

Share

Most fund managers struggle to deliver a 1% outperformance every year, and with the cash rate at 1.5%, investors need to eke out every bit of return they can find. So it’s important to know how investment structures work. In particular, the tax impact of investing in June can be a trap for the unwary and cause unexpected leakage in tax.

Distributions from a unit trust

In a unit trust, all income received (including realised capital gains) is divided among unit holders based on how many units they hold at the time of a distribution. Unit holders must then include their share of this income (which may comprise dividends, interest, capital gains and franking (imputation) credits) in their own tax return in the year it was earned.

The same distributions are paid to all unit holders according to their holding on a particular day, whether or not the investor has been in the fund one day or one year. Distributions are not pro-rated for investors who were not unitholders for the whole period. An investor may receive some of their investment back immediately as income if they invested just before a distribution.

Immediately after a distribution is declared, the unit price of the fund will usually fall by the amount of the distribution, because the distribution reduces the fund’s assets.

The most important point on timing

An investment in June that receives a distribution in say July may be converting capital to taxable income. For example, if someone invests on 25 June 2017 when the unit price is say $1.00 and then a 10 cent per unit distribution is made on 30 June, the unit price will fall to 90 cents (assuming no market movement) at the beginning of July and the 10 cents will be taxable income in the hands of the unit holder in their 2016/2017 tax return.

Obviously, the worst consequences are for individuals with high marginal tax rates where the distribution includes no franking credits. This might be the case for a global equity fund which distributes once a year with no franking credits from Australian companies.

Alternatively, an investor such as a tax-free charity or super fund in pension mode in an Australian equity fund might pay no tax and receive a franking credit, so a June investment might actually be favourable for them.

The only way to eliminate these effects would be for the fund trustee to make a daily distribution, but clearly this is not practical. The more often a fund distributes income during the year then the less of an issue this distribution inequity becomes. For example, most Australian equity funds distribute twice per year but most international funds only distribute once per year.

Other funds with particularly punitive outcomes for unit holders who invest close to a distribution date might be actively-traded funds in a rising market. They might have large capital gains on shares not held for longer than 12 months (and therefore, not subject to the 50% CGT discount factor). The distribution might contain a large taxable capital gain component.

How do we handle the problem with the Third Link Growth Fund?

Many of you know I manage a unit trust, the Third Link Growth Fund. I consider this issue of such significance that from the start of May each year, I ask our administrator to contact every new applicant and check whether they understand the tax consequences. While this might cost us some application money in the short term, hopefully it builds a better long-term investor experience.

I also provide a health warning in the PDS for Third Link Growth Fund. It says: “Distributions are not pro-rated for investors who were not unitholders for the whole period, meaning that you may receive some of your investment back immediately as income if you invest just before a distribution.”

Billions of dollars will flow into unit trusts in the next month as investors top up their superannuation prior to the more restrictive rules from 1 July 2017. Anyone who invests in June should at least ask the fund manager for an estimate of the distribution and its tax components, unless they want to share the tax burden for prior investors.

 

Chris Cuffe is co-founder of Cuffelinks; founder & Portfolio Manager of the charitable trust Third Link Growth Fund; Chairman of UniSuper; and Chairman of Australian Philanthropic Services. The views expressed are his own.

Share
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

, ,

4 Responses to Warning about investing in unit trusts in June

  1. Graeme May 25, 2017 at 7:31 PM #

    Not just applicable to investing in June. I was an initial investor in a new fund in November 2015 that invested in a parent fund. The new fund was in the red as at 30 June 2016. I then received a taxable distribution for income that the parent fund had earned prior to the new fund even existing! I felt that the PDS had not adequately warned of the potential for this to occur and informed the manager of this. Unfortunately I felt their response also was not adequate. Definitely a case of buyer beware.

  2. dauf May 25, 2017 at 3:40 PM #

    Excellent article…only wish i read one like it two years ago when as novice i invested; as it turned out to be processed on the morning of the 30 June, and the scenario you outlined occurred in the same afternoon! Notification of taxes etc came 16 days later (2 days outside a cooling off period)…the joys of ignorance!

  3. Warren Bird May 25, 2017 at 3:19 PM #

    Of course some trusts are electing to operate under the recently enacted Attribution Managed Investment Trust regime, which gets around many of these problems. It’s worth investors asking their fund manager if their fund has opted into the new system or not. If it has, then you don’t have to worry about these implications of investing in June.

    Mind you, I’m not sure how many of the major fund managers have made this election just yet. I recommend they hurry up, because if ever the government enacted something so clearly in investors interests it was this!

  4. David May 25, 2017 at 2:23 PM #

    Worth mentioning that funds have the right to make special distributions to reduce the impact of a major transaction on other investors, such as an institutional redemption, to ensure the tax consequences go with the departing investor.

Leave a Comment:

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Register for our free weekly newsletter

New registrations receive free copies of our special investment ebooks.